Monthly Archives: August 2015

XOLAIR SIDE EFFECTS ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Xolair Can Increase the Risk of Severe Heart Problems, Brain and Blood Vessel Problems and Cancer

According to class action lawsuits filed against Genentech and Novartis, the makers and marketers of Xolair, the companies knew of the serious risks of the medication but failed to warn the public.

If you or a family member has taken Xolair and have been injured, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
XOLAIR SIDE EFFECTS ALERT

XOLAIR SIDE EFFECTS ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in lawsuits involving defective drugs.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its

About Xolair

Xolair (omalizumab) was approved by the FDA in 2003 to treat patients 12 years and older with moderate to severe asthma caused by allergens also called allergic asthma. Xolair is an injection which helps reduce the number of asthma attacks for those who are still suffering from asthma symptoms even though they are taking inhaled steroids. Xolair is also approved for use with those who suffer from chronic hives and are not helped by taking H1 antihistamine treatments.

The possible side effects of Xolair include:

  • Heart attack
  • Mini-strokes
  • Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs)
  • Chest pain
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Blood clots in lungs and veins
  • Cancer

In 2009, the FDA required the makers of Xolair, Grenentech, Inc., to perform a 5-year study regarding the safety of the drug. Due to the data from this study, the FDA ruled in September 2014 that new warnings on Xolair package inserts and prescribing information need to be added detailing the risks of serious complications caused by the drug’s side effects. During the same time, the FDA issued a drug safety warning that Xolair’s side effects can cause the serious complications listed above. The new safety warnings join a black box warning added in 2007 regarding the risk of severe and life threatening allergic reaction called anaphylaxis.

SLING MEDIA INC. LAWSUIT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN SEEKING RECOVERY

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Sling Media Alleging Misrepresentation of Service and Unfair Business Practice

According to a complaint filed on July 10, 2015, Sling Media broadcasted advertisements on its Slingbox device without prior notice or permission from its customers.

If you or a family member has purchased a Sling Media device prior to March 17, 2015, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
SLING MEDIA INC. LAWSUIT

SLING MEDIA INC. LAWSUIT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in consumer lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit.

About The Class Action Lawsuit Against Sling Media

A Class Action complaint was filed against Sling Media on July 10, 2015 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging the defendant engaged in misrepresentation of service and unfair business practice when it posted original advertisements on its Slingbox device without prior notice or consent of the consumer. The plaintiffs state their devices, which stream television content onto a user’s mobile device, tablet or laptop, were free of advertisements up until March 17, 2015. The complaint contends this is a classic “bait and switch” in that owners of the Slingbox must now watch the advertisements in order to use their devices as promised.

CNA INSURANCE: BREACH OF TERMS OF LONG TERM CARE POLICIES ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN SEEKING RECOVERY

Lawsuit filed against CNA Financial Corp. and Continental Casualty Company (“CNA”) Alleging Breach of the Terms of Long Term Care Insurance Policies by Excluding Coverage at Assisted Living Facilities

According to the complaint filed on May 18, 2015, CNA is breaching the terms of its long term care policies by denying coverage for all claims filed for stays at assisted living facilities.

If you or a family member has a long term care policy with CNA, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
CNA INSURANCE

CNA INSURANCE

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in lawsuits against insurance companies.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit.

About CNA’s Breach of Terms of Its Long Term Care Policies

A complaint was filed on May 18, 2015 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin accusing CNA of breaching its terms of their long term care policies. Plaintiff claims CNA is misrepresenting the Wisconsin statutory definition for assisted living facilities and the requirements of its long term care policies to justify denying all claims at the state’s assisted living facilities. To qualify for benefits of a CNA long term care policy, you must show that you are medically eligible and the long term care facility meets the policy’s definition of such. At issue in this lawsuit is the definition of 24- hour-a-day nursing service and whether any Wisconsin assisted living facility can meet this requirement. Plaintiff alleges CNA is wrongfully stating that no Wisconsin assisted living facility can meet the 24-hour-a-day nursing service requirement. Plaintiff further states CNA is denying to pay claims at facilities in which they had paid in the past. Plaintiff adds that CNA also requested and received a 45% rate increase on these very policies.

C-QUR MESH ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Class Action Lawsuits Filed Nationwide on Behalf of Victims Injured by C-QUR Mesh

According to multiple class action lawsuits filed across the country, C-QUR Mesh failures have caused serious side effects including infections, internal injuries and mesh adhesion

If you or a family member has or had a C-QUR Mesh implanted and have been injured, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
C-QUR MESH ALERT

C-QUR MESH ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in medical device lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit.

About C-QUR Mesh

C-QUR Mesh is manufactured by Atrium Medical Corporation and was approved by the FDA in 2006 for hernia repair, chest wall reconstruction and the repair of surgical wounds. In July 2013, Atrium voluntarily recalled the hernia repair implants due to the coating of C-QUR Mesh sticking to the inner package lining when exposed to excessive humidity for an extended period of time.

Class action lawsuits have been filed nationwide against Atrium alleging plaintiffs have suffered serious side effects due to the implantation of C-QUR Mesh. Many plaintiffs have experienced infections, internal injuries to nearby organs, nerves and/or blood vessels, mesh adhesion to the intestines, chronic pain and recurring hernia. The numerous lawsuits claim Atrium failed to conduct adequate research and testing of the C-QUR Mesh and misled the public when it marketed the product as safe and effective knowing it could cause serious medical problems.

BEYAZ ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Lawsuits Are Being Filed Against Bayer, the Makers of Beyaz, Claiming Serious Complications

According to class action lawsuits filed nationwide, Beyaz has caused women to have serious side effects including gallbladder disease, stroke, blood clots and death.

If you or a family member have or currently use Beyaz and have been injured, you may be entitled to compensation.

Bayer paid $1.4 billion to settle close to 7,000 blood clot lawsuits

Bayer has created a fund of $24 million for gallbladder claims for more than 8,000 plaintiffs

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
BEYAZ ALERT

BEYAZ ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in medical device lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit.

About Beyaz

Beyaz is an oral contraceptive which is prescribed to avoid pregnancy. It is the “sister” medication to Yaz and Yasmin. All are manufactured by Bayer Pharmaceuticals.

All oral contraceptives contain ethinyl estradiol, a man-made estrogen-like hormone that increases clotting factors in the blood. Some studies show that the newer contraceptives with third and fourth generation progestins have a different reaction with ethinyl estradiol and carries a greater risk than older medications. Beyaz contains drospirenone, a fourth generation progestin.

Beyaz and other oral contraceptives containing drospireone have caused women serious side effects such as gallbladder disease, stroke, blood clots and death. Many women who have suffered from these adverse effects have filed class action lawsuits claiming they were not adequately warned of the dangers of taking Beyaz and Bayer knew or should have known about these dangerous side effects.

TRIBENZOR ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Tribenzor May Lead to Kidney Failure and Cause Serious Gastrointestinal Problems

Studies show Tribenzor, used to treat high blood pressure, may lead to kidney failure and/or sprue-like enteropathy including severe diarrhea, weight loss and malnutrition.

If you or a family member has used Tribenzor and have been injured, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
TRIBENZOR ALERT

TRIBENZOR ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in lawsuits involving defective drugs.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its

About Tribenzor

Tribenzor, made by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., was approved by the FDA in 2010 to treat high blood pressure. The drug is an angiotensin II receptor blocker that lowers blood pressure by relaxing the blood vessels and eliminating some of the salt and water in the bloodstream. Studies show that, Tribenzor, which contains olmesartan, can cause sprue-like enteropathy which causes severe diarrhea and severe weight loss. Tribenzor can also cause muscle damage that can lead to kidney failure. In 2013, the FDA issued a warning that Tribenzor, and other drugs that contain olmesartan, may increase the risk of sprue-like enteropathy.

DEFECTIVE BRAKE SYSTEMS ON 2006-2010 HYUNDAI SONATAS ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Hyundai Alleging Hyundai Knowingly Sold Defective Brake Systems

According to the class action complaint filed June 17, 2015, Hyundai manufactured and sold defective brake systems in Hyundai Sonatas for model years 2006-2010. These defective brake systems can cause premature deterioration and failure when the brakes are applied. This presents an excessive danger to the consumer and the driving public.

If you or a family member currently owns a Hyundai Sonata model year 2006-20010 and have experienced early brake deterioration or failure, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
DEFECTIVE BRAKE SYSTEMS ON 2006-2010 HYUNDAI SONATAS ALERT

DEFECTIVE BRAKE SYSTEMS ON 2006-2010 HYUNDAI SONATAS ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in defective products lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit [consider linking “CONTACT US NOW” again to our number and/or the “CLAIM FORM”].

About Defective Brake Systems on 2006-2010 Hyundai Sonatas

A class action complaint was filed on June 17, 2015 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging Hyundai designed, manufactured, tested, marketed, distributed and knowingly sold defective braking systems on the 2006-2010 Hyundai Sonatas. According to the plaintiffs, these defective braking systems cause significant squeaking and unreasonably premature break down of the rotors and pads. If the condition is not rectified by replacing the entire braking system, complete braking failure can occur. This presents an extreme danger to not only the driver, but also the driving public. The complaint further alleges Hyundai knew of the defect and its effects through previously released data, testing, maintenance reports and customer complaints. Finally, plaintiffs accuse Hyundai of concealing and failing to disclose this information to the consumer at the time of vehicle purchase. To date, Hyundai has not recalled or offered to repair or replace the defective braking system, leaving the costs of the repairs and/or replacement to the consumer.

HOOSIER RACING TIRES ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Hoosier Racing Tire Corporation Failed to Disclose a Major Defect in its Hoosier D.O.T. – Radial Racing Tires

A class action lawsuit was filed on June 18, 2015 alleging the Hoosier Racing Tire Corporation knowingly sold defective tires causing blowouts and leaving drivers unable to control their cars.

If you or a family member have or have had Hoosier D.O.T. Radial Racing Tires and have experienced a blowout on any of the tires and have been injured, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
HOOSIER RACING TIRES ALERT

HOOSIER RACING TIRES ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in defective products lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit.

About Hoosier D.O.T. Radial Racing Tires

A class action lawsuit was filed on June 18, 2015 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleging Hoosier Racing Tire Corporation manufactured and sold defective racing tires. The complaint asserts that the tires tend to have tread separation which leads to a “wart like” growth in the middle of the tire. This results in a large amount of vibration and eventual tire blow out leaving the driver with virtually no control of the car. This tire defect can result in damage to the race car, damage to the racetrack facility and replacement of the tires which are valued at $1200-$1400 per set.

Plaintiff further alleges that Hoosier Racing Tire Corporation knew or should have known of the tire defect and failed to warn the public of said defect. To date, the company has not recalled the racing tires nor offered to reimburse its customers for any expenses due to the repair or replacement of the defective tires.

DEFECTIVE GENERAL ELECTRIC GAS RANGE OVENS ALERT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES FOR YOUR INJURIES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN YOUR RECOVERY

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against General Electric Alleging GE Knowingly Manufactured and Sold Defective Gas Ranges

According to the class action complaint filed June 17, 2015, GE manufactured and sold the defective 40” Free Standing Gas Range oven (Model JGB600EEDES) causing the surface knob to be turned and flammable gas to be released when the oven is subject to minor bumps. It also contains an ignition system defect which does not ignite gas in a timely manner.

If you or a family member currently or has owned the GE 40” Free Stranding Gas Range (Model JGB600EEDES) and have been injured or have had to repair or replace said oven, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
DEFECTIVE GENERAL ELECTRIC GAS RANGE OVENS ALERT

DEFECTIVE GENERAL ELECTRIC GAS RANGE OVENS ALERT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in defective products lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merit [consider linking “CONTACT US NOW” again to our number and/or the “CLAIM FORM”].

About GE Defective Gas Range Ovens

A class action complaint was filed on June 17, 2015 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging General Electric designed, manufactured, tested, marketed, distributed and knowingly sold defective gas range ovens. The 40” Free Standing Gas Range oven, model JGB600EEDES all contain the same surface knob and ignition system defects. The complaint states when the knobs are subject to minor, everyday bumps or movement, the burner valve opens and releases flammable gas. This release of gas creates an unreasonable and often dangerous risk for the consumer. The complaint continues to state the ovens also contain an ignition system defect which causes a delay igniting the released gas. According to the complaint, GE has not offered to repair or replace the defective gas ovens, leaving the consumer with a defective product which needs to be repaired or replaced at their expense.

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS INC.’S LAWSUIT

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES – WE ARE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST YOU IN SEEKING RECOVERY

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Foster Farms Alleging the American Humane Association Certification Label is Misleading

According to a complaint filed on July 13, 2015, despite labeling their products with a certification from the American Humane Association, Foster Farms chickens are mutilated and mistreated before enduring painful deaths.

If you or a family member have purchased Foster Poultry Farms chicken and did so believing the chicken was produced in humane conditions, you may be entitled to compensation.

DON’T DELAY – CALL US 888-252-0048 OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE CLAIM FORM
FOSTER POULTRY FARMS INC.’S LAWSUIT

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS INC.’S LAWSUIT

  • Our firm is vigorously pursuing this matter.
  • Our clients have received millions of dollars in consumer lawsuits.
  • No Charge or Obligation for Our Experienced Attorney Review

CONTACT US NOW! Do Not Delay As The Applicable Statute Of Limitations May Result In A Complete Bar To Your Claim Regardless Of Its Merits.

About The Class Action Lawsuit Against Foster Farms

A Class Action complaint was filed against Foster Poultry Farms Inc. on July 13, 2015 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging the defendants engaged in false and misleading advertising when it labeled its chicken with a certification from the American Humane Association (“AHA”). The complaint states the certification label creates a reasonable expectation to the consumer that the chicken they are purchasing was produced in humane conditions. The plaintiff states she discovered the AHA certification doesn’t require special treatment of chickens. According to the complaint, the AHA standards just require the eggs to come from facilities that avoid contagion. The plaintiff describes a number of abuses the chickens allegedly suffer at Foster Farms including forced molting and beak-trimming; being starved and not given water; and male chicks being ground up alive. Plaintiff contends that she relied on the AHA certification label when making her purchase and believed the chicken she purchased was created in humane conditions.